Faster release readiness · For product assurance and security operations
Requirement-to-evidence traceability, kept current for every release
Keep the assessment evidence assembled and current.
A requirement-to-evidence traceability agent keeps your release evidence connected to the agreed requirements. It gathers evidence, maps it to requirements, checks versions, scope and contradictions, and updates the package as documents change. You receive a current requirement-to-evidence matrix and gap register. Decisions about whether the evidence is sufficient stay with your team and assessors.
The problem · Faster release readiness
Why release evidence goes stale
Evidence drifts as the product changes: a test report still refers to last release’s firmware, a design document is superseded mid-cycle, a support claim is no longer true.
Gaps are then found late, just before release, and every cycle starts with a manual re-check of the whole package.
How the agent solves it
What a current requirement-to-evidence matrix contains
Each row links a requirement to its evidence item, the version or scope that evidence covers, a status (sufficient, stale, missing or contradicted), an owner and the revision history.
The requirements are the ones you agree with your team and assessors. The agent keeps the evidence for them current; it doesn’t decide which requirements apply.
What the agent does as documents change
Gather and map
It gathers release evidence and maps it to the agreed requirements.
Check
It checks versions, scope and contradictions.
Update
As documents change, it updates the package, removes obsolete support claims and maintains the gap register.
Request
Your team receives a current package and specific requests for missing evidence.
Vulnerability decisions feed your security evidence: OT vulnerability triage.
Worked example
Worked example: a firmware update makes one test report stale
Illustrative example: fictional product.
Step 1 of 3 · Release candidate changes
Firmware 3.2 replaces 3.1
The security-requirements test report in the package still references firmware 3.1.
Step 2 of 3 · Evidence flagged
Stale, not supported
The agent flags the report as stale because of the version mismatch, withdraws the “supported” status of the linked requirement and adds a gap-register entry with the exact request: a test record for 3.2 covering that requirement.
Step 3 of 3 · Gap closed
Re-checked on arrival
The change is recorded in the revision history. When the new report arrives, the agent re-checks its scope and closes the gap.
| Requirement | Evidence | Status | Gap register |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security requirement (example) | Test report · firmware 3.1 | stale: release is 3.2 | request: test record for 3.2 |
| Same requirement, later | Test report · firmware 3.2 | sufficient | gap closed · revision logged |
Trust & governance
Autonomy with governance: defined rules, approvals where you require them, and a full audit trail.
Agent
What you receive
A current requirement-to-evidence matrix, release evidence package, gap register and revision history.
Your team
What stays with your team
- Supplying missing records and resolving disputed interpretations.
- Decisions about whether the evidence is sufficient. The agent does not issue a declaration and does not replace an assessor.
Your environment
Where it runs and who controls it
The agent and runtime run on site, in your environment. You control access, model and context versions, and updates.
ArchitectureKPIs to measure
What we agree to measure with you, without promised numbers: agree the workload and completion criteria, then compare accepted results with your current process.
Evidence refresh lead time
Reduce time from an evidence change to an updated assessment package.
Human evidence preparation effort
Reduce hours spent assembling, checking and maintaining accepted evidence packages.
Current supported requirement coverage
Increase the share of agreed requirements backed by current, sufficient evidence.
False support claims and missed gaps
Reduce unsupported conclusions and evidence gaps missed by the assessment.
How to measure it
Human effort
Count preparation, exceptions, audits, corrections and fallback work alongside the hours the agent takes over.
Completion and quality
Track accepted jobs against all eligible work, including blocked cases and failures. Record errors and reopened cases with turnaround time.
Operating value
Measure changes in downtime, rework or release delay separately. Value released capacity and realized cost savings separately, after deployment and operating costs.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
What is requirement-to-evidence traceability?
A record that links each agreed requirement to the evidence that supports it, with the version or scope covered, a status, an owner and the revision history.
Which requirements does the agent work with?
The requirements you agree on with your team and assessors. The agent maintains the evidence for them; deciding which requirements apply stays with you.
How do you keep a traceability matrix current between releases?
Re-check evidence whenever a document, version or scope changes, and keep the status and revision history per requirement.
Does the agent decide that a release is ready?
No. It maintains the evidence. Decisions about whether the evidence is sufficient stay with your team and assessors.
What happens when evidence is missing or contradictory?
It becomes a gap-register entry with a specific request for the missing or corrected evidence.
Can our product documentation stay on site?
Yes. The agent runs on site, in your environment, under your control.
Put your agent to work
Let’s talk about your industrial task.
Tell us about the workload, the evidence it uses and the results you need.
Contact us